June 1, 2006
June 1, 2006
![]() |
HEALTH AND MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE LAW AUSTRALIA
|
Navigate:
|
LITIGATION STATISTICS in the NEWS
12.04.07
Malpractice suits pay out over $150m in Australia More than $150 million was paid out last year to Australian patients and their families who sued their doctors for malpractice following injury or death. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) released a report on Thursday into medical indemnity insurance that found about 2500 claims were made against doctors in 2005-06. The average payout was about $60,000. The government has charged the ACCC with investigating whether the premiums charged by the six medical indemnity insurers in Australia are justified. It found premiums, which had fallen about six per cent since the last annual report to an average of $5,537, were justified. Source: SMH 12.04.07
01.09.06 Claims rise against GPs no cause for alarm
21.08.06 Medical Indemnity Claims Drop The Medical Indemnity Industry Association of Australia (MIIAA) has released a report on premium and indemnity claim trends from 1995 to 2005. It shows that insurance premiums have fallen by about 11% between 2003 and 2005. It also indicates a dramatic drop in claims against neurosurgeons, orthopaedic surgeons and anaesthetists, though GPs have had more claims made against them. The report can be found at: http://www.miiaa.com.au/media/files/462.pdf.
Claiming behaviour in a no-fault system of medical injury: a descriptive analysis of claimants and non-claimants Objectives:
(i) To determine the proportion of patients in New Zealand who claim compensation from the national no-fault compensation program after experiencing a compensable injury; and (ii) to identify characteristics of injured patients who are least likely to claim despite having sustained a compensable injury. Results:
Among patients judged by NZQHS reviewers to be eligible for compensation, 2.9% (6/210) claimed. Odds of claiming after an adverse event were significantly lower for patients who were elderly (odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.14–0.28), from the most deprived areas (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23–0.57), or of Māori; or Pacific ethnicity (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.32–0.69 and OR, 0.26, 95% CI, 0.11–0.58).
Conclusions:
Despite few apparent institutional or economic barriers, the proportion of injured patients in NZ who seek compensation after sustaining a compensable injury is very low. Hence, substantial underclaiming occurs in both negligence and no-fault systems. The disproportionately low propensity of elderly, poor and minority patients to seek compensation also appears to be pervasive.
29.06.06 Health claim delays Sixty-six claims that were resolved were more than five years old. Claims related to failures to perform procedures, wrong procedures, procedures performed on the wrong area of the body, post-operative complications, and failures of procedures. An Institute of Health and Welfare report found obstetrics (18 per cent), accident and emergency (15 per cent) and general surgery (11 per cent) incurred the most claims. Of claims examined in the report, Medical indemnity national collection (public sector): 2004-2005, 58 per cent related to adults, 19 per cent to children and 10 per cent to babies under one year old. The claims, recorded in the Medical Indemnity National Collection, also revealed 27 cases were settled in 2004-05 for at least $500,000. Source: Herald Sun News.com.au 29.06.06. [AIHW: Medical indemnity national data collection, public sector 2004-05] 01.06.06 Why NSW is no longer the state to litigate Michael Pelly Legal Reporter
June 1, 2006 NSW has long been thought of as the litigation capital of Australia. But a Law Council study shows that title belongs to the ACT, with the premier state languishing in fourth place. For the past decade Canberrans have been up to five times more likely to lodge personal injury claims than residents of other states and territories. Even after the tort law changes of 2002, courts in the national capital have been handing 7.4 claims per 10,000 people, ahead of Western Australia (4.5), Tasmania (2.8) and NSW (2.1). The report by the dean of the University of Newcastle's law school, Ted Wright, reveals that since 2002, personal injury actions have fallen by up to 80 per cent, with NSW recording a 63.2 per cent decrease. Professor Wright's study suggests there was no litigation "explosion" leading up to the reforms - a claim rejected yesterday by insurers who said this failed to consider increased payouts and claims that did not proceed to the courts. The Chief Justice of NSW, Jim Spigelman, has questioned whether the changes went too far and other judges have said the level of impairment required to recover damages is too high. The Premier, Morris Iemma, said the changes had brought about "significant benefits" in stabilising workers' compensation and liability insurancecosts. He did not refer to personal injury claims, which Professor Wright said had undergone a "breathtaking adjustment". The ACT was a clear leader in negligence claims that had to be decided in the courts - before and after the 2002 changes. It handled 9.4 claims per 10,000 people before 2002, a figure that has fallen to 7.4. It was followed by Western Australia (8 per 100,000 to 4.5), Tasmania (6.4 to 2.8), NSW (5.7 to 2.1), Queensland (3.4 to 1) and Victoria (2.7 to 0.5). The president of the Law Council, Tim Bugg, said the changes had "simply diminished the rights of injured Australians to claim compensation".
|
FOR OBLIGATION-FREE LEGAL ADVICE PLEASE COMPLETE THE CONTACT FORM OR CALL OUR HELPLINE ON: 1800 529 835
Form
Please read our Terms of Use. |
Copyright 2008 - solicitoradvice.com - All Rights Reserved.
www.solicitoradvice.com is an independent information and referral service, and not a legal practice. Enquiries to this website are referred directly to solicitors.